View topic - Does Rosetta Stone realy work?
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Sat 10.01.2005 1:02 am
She knew how to say "The elephant is bigger than the dog," but had no idea how to say anything worthwhile.... i think that basically sums it up.
That phrase isn't even in Rosetta Stone. Though if it were, it would be in the lesson on comparisons. By the time you get to that unit, you can count, tell time, describe shapes and colors, and locations of things (on top, under, beside, between, within), know left/right, and names for a number of clothing items and foods, run, walk, jump, swim...
Basically, if she got that far, she should have been able to say plenty of things that are worthwhile. They're not exactly deep conversation, but the basics are necessary. Comparisons are in Unit 3 out of 26 units, each unit having 10 lessons + 1 review lesson.
Rosetta Stone can't be used by anyone who still expects a 1:1 on language, or who expects to be talking about the same stuff they do in their native language from day one.
I suspect the sorts of people who would have the most success with Rosetta Stone would be those who have already learned a second language.
I have the Rosetta Stone software on my computer and I found it useless unless you want to expand your vocabulary. The "lessons" arent structured at all. You start off looking at pictures of people and animals and you have to pick out the japanese word for such (Without a lesson on what is what that is).
The guided lesson gives you the answer for each of the 4 pictures, then immediately has you regurgitate that information quiz-style. Then, in an SRS-like way, it will review items you get wrong. It takes approximately 20 minutes to do a lesson this way, but it is the one that teaches you the right answers. The "exercises" are for review, and isolate different aspects of the things learned in that lesson, such as reading only, listening only, reading and listening, etc.
Skipping the guided lesson seems to be the biggest mistake of new RS users.
I've just started using RS for Mandarin Chinese, and have -no- background with the language aside from watching Meteor Garden. My children use RS; one for spanish (my son, age 7) and one for Japanese (my daughter, age 6). Their retention is absolutely amazing!
I'll say again, though. If someone needs the technical explanations of what every single thing is, then RS is going to be nothing but a headache. It's all in the approach to the language. I believe RS gives you a "real" connection to the language without inbetweening to your native language -- but only if you let it.
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Wed 07.05.2006 3:02 am
Like saraLynne noted, what makes it so great is that you think in the target language and have the words connected to pictures and thoughts, without using your native language as a link to the new language. However, I need pretty detailed descriptions as to WHY things are working the way they are, and the program doesn't supply that. Because of all this, I don't dismiss it outright, because when it comes to what it does, it does it very very well. However, its very possible that this method won't work for many people as a means of obtaining true working fluency. It was definitely a trip knowing how to construct that many sentences in spanish in so little time, though .
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri 11.02.2007 12:30 am
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed 08.02.2006 3:36 am
I also think that using just pictures and no explanations can sometimes lead one to make the wrong connections.
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu 11.22.2007 8:46 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests