kaiten sushi

[paul_b]

Check out the last cartoon on this page
http://tsubame-jnr.bglb.jp/~nounaihasei/img437.jpg *
for an interesting insight into 'revolving sushi'. Then try it out yourself

* The comic is mot worksafe in general but that link is pretty much OK.

[EDIT]Now direct link to .jpg

[Harisenbon]

Nono... That link was pretty much not ok...

I've never clicked 閉じる that fast in my life. （汗

[keatonatron]

Doesn't work.

[chikara]

Forbidden
お呼びでない

[paul_b]

keatonatron wrote:
Doesn't work.

Gah. Well the first link was
http://tsubame-jnr.bglb.jp/~nounaihasei/page047.html

I really think harisenbon was over-reacting - I'd say a bit over PG-13 at worst on that page, at least if you don't read the (Japanese) text. There's no nudity, some sexual content, overdone blood-splatter on fight scenes but everybody's back to normal by the next .jpg.

Just make sure you scroll to the bottom of the page if you're worried.

[Harisenbon]

Paul,

Honestly, I personally don't care about the content at all. Anything short for full on nudity/organ spilling, I'm perfectly cool with it. However, when you say "safe for work" what you are implying is that if someone was to glance at my screen, and see what I was looking at, there would be no problem. However, The third panel down had some rather busty shots, as well as the fact that the whole comic is drawn in a very porno-doujinshi style. If I was at home, no sweat. Even in front of my wife, no sweat. But work is a different story.

No nudity / Safe for work was the issue I had.

[Mike Cash]

"Safe for work" is a highly, highly relative term.

My coworkers wouldn't bat an eye at anything.

[two_heads_talking]

the normal "Safe for Work" would obviously be different for each job. Some could care less if you had gratuitous interaction and others would be upset at the mere mention of sex. Having said that, "Safe for Work" as a general statement I think is pretty much internationally understood. Unless someone just wants to be contrary. And there will be those who choose that route as well.

[keatonatron]

Mike Cash wrote:
"Safe for work" is a highly, highly relative term.

My coworkers wouldn't bat an eye at anything.

Your coworkers don't browse the net at work. At least I hope not!

(well, I guess if they're riding shotgun it's okay)

[Mike Cash]

two_heads_talking wrote:
the normal "Safe for Work" would obviously be different for each job. Some could care less if you had gratuitous interaction and others would be upset at the mere mention of sex. Having said that, "Safe for Work" as a general statement I think is pretty much internationally understood. Unless someone just wants to be contrary. And there will be those who choose that route as well.

Count on me to be Johnny-on-the-spot when an opportunity to be contrary presents its self.

[two_heads_talking]

even though I was not specifically noting you as being contrary, you stepped up to the plate and put it out of the park.. good on ya.

[Mike Cash]

two_heads_talking wrote:
even though I was not specifically noting you as being contrary, you stepped up to the plate and put it out of the park.. good on ya.

This above all, to thine own self etc etc.