View topic - 歴史について質問
歴史について質問
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
歴史について質問
Hi everyone, it's me.
I'm writing a fictional novel based at the very beginning of the Edo period, starting around the time of Sekigahara. I want to be as accurate as possible, but even with research there are questions that remain and sources that need proving.
I'm under the impression that gunpowder was introduced to Japan (by the portugese) before 1600. However I'm uncertain as to whether the "early rifle" would be manufactured and maintained by samurai once Ieyasu gained power. For example, would guns be used in the Osaka castle siege? I appreciate that few people may be able to answer this question, but if I can get an answer it will help give me the bigger picture.
I'm writing a fictional novel based at the very beginning of the Edo period, starting around the time of Sekigahara. I want to be as accurate as possible, but even with research there are questions that remain and sources that need proving.
I'm under the impression that gunpowder was introduced to Japan (by the portugese) before 1600. However I'm uncertain as to whether the "early rifle" would be manufactured and maintained by samurai once Ieyasu gained power. For example, would guns be used in the Osaka castle siege? I appreciate that few people may be able to answer this question, but if I can get an answer it will help give me the bigger picture.
なぜなら、おまえは・・・・・・人形だ
-

Ongakuka - Posts: 905
- Joined: Mon 09.26.2005 1:07 pm
RE: 歴史について質問
You know, history books HAVE this stuff. If you read *anything* about the Osaka campaigns, they'll talk about the cannons.
Tony
Tony
-

AJBryant - Site Admin
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Sun 10.09.2005 11:29 am
- Location: Indiana
- Native language: English
- Gender: Male
RE: 歴史について質問
For an earlier battle where arquebuses were used effectively, take a look at Oda/Tokugawa vs Takeda at Nagashino 1575.
-

Kagemaru - Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun 09.17.2006 8:56 am
- Location: 奈良
- Native language: Greek
- Gender: Male
RE: 歴史について質問
Once firearms were introduced to Japan, they remained an integral part of the combat scene throughout Japanese history. Hikone Castle, built post-Sekigahara, has holes in the walls specifically for the use of firearms on an invader. Matchlocks were used through the Tokugawa period for dealing with peasant uprisings.
Josh Reyer
------------
頓ニ纜ヲ斬テ大荒ニ入レ。
長岡桃嶺房成
------------
頓ニ纜ヲ斬テ大荒ニ入レ。
長岡桃嶺房成
- Shirasagi
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Wed 02.14.2007 10:50 am
RE: 歴史について質問
kagemaruさんがすでに答えてくださっていますが、長篠合戦図屏風(←)が徳川美術館のサイトにありましたのでご参考までに。
もっとも三千挺という数字は今では疑問視されています。
鉄砲伝来の研究の一端はここで読めます。
http://www.rekihaku.ac.jp/e-rekihaku/126/rekishi.html
2006年秋、国立歴史民俗博物館の企画展示に関する紹介文です。
「火縄銃」というキーワードでYouTube を探せばいくつか映像が見られますよ。
もっとも三千挺という数字は今では疑問視されています。
鉄砲伝来の研究の一端はここで読めます。
http://www.rekihaku.ac.jp/e-rekihaku/126/rekishi.html
2006年秋、国立歴史民俗博物館の企画展示に関する紹介文です。
「火縄銃」というキーワードでYouTube を探せばいくつか映像が見られますよ。
Last edited by coco on Fri 04.06.2007 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- coco
- Posts: 3061
- Joined: Mon 05.30.2005 12:43 am
- Location: 東京都
- Native language: 日本語(Japanese)
RE: 歴史について質問
Thanks to everyone who posted here, I promise to make good use of all your explanations and advice 
なぜなら、おまえは・・・・・・人形だ
-

Ongakuka - Posts: 905
- Joined: Mon 09.26.2005 1:07 pm
RE: 歴史について質問
By the time of Sekigahara guns had outpaced the bow on the battlefield and many Daimyo had access to gun producing factories.
EDIT..I should point out that guns where not used much for "one on one" combat (though Ninja did employ them on an individual scale). They where used mostly in large scale battles. Therefore an individual samurai would not have had his own gun.
EDIT..I should point out that guns where not used much for "one on one" combat (though Ninja did employ them on an individual scale). They where used mostly in large scale battles. Therefore an individual samurai would not have had his own gun.
Last edited by ghosthacker on Sat 04.07.2007 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

ghosthacker - Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu 12.28.2006 10:39 pm
RE: 歴史について質問
AJBryant wrote:
You know, history books HAVE this stuff. If you read *anything* about the Osaka campaigns, they'll talk about the cannons.
Tony
Yeap, though unlike guns the Japanese where not very good at the use or making of cannons (compared to western powers) and in some cases had help from Dutch ships when cannon fire was needed.
-

ghosthacker - Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu 12.28.2006 10:39 pm
-

AJBryant - Site Admin
- Posts: 5313
- Joined: Sun 10.09.2005 11:29 am
- Location: Indiana
- Native language: English
- Gender: Male
-

Infidel - Posts: 3088
- Joined: Sun 10.09.2005 1:12 am
- Native language: 英語
RE: 歴史について質問
bleh, I always forget if it is reishiki or reikishi
The word for history? Rekishi-れきし-歴史
Two muffins were baking in an oven. One turns to the other and says "sure is hot in here." The other replies "AH TALKING MUFFIN!"
二つのマフィンがオーブンで焼かれていた。片方のマフィンがもう一方のマフィンに向かって、"暑いね”と言った。すると、話しかけられたほうのマフィンは"アッ!喋るマフィンだ!”と驚いた。 :)
二つのマフィンがオーブンで焼かれていた。片方のマフィンがもう一方のマフィンに向かって、"暑いね”と言った。すると、話しかけられたほうのマフィンは"アッ!喋るマフィンだ!”と驚いた。 :)
-

flammable hippo - Posts: 885
- Joined: Sun 03.19.2006 4:29 pm
- Native language: English
- Gender: Male
RE: 歴史について質問
right, the problem is, every time I see that word, I have to look up the reading again. I know what it means, but I always get confused about the pronounciation.
なるほど。
さっぱりわからん。
さっぱりわからん。
-

Infidel - Posts: 3088
- Joined: Sun 10.09.2005 1:12 am
- Native language: 英語
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to History and Literature Discussions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests







Click to sign up
